NextFin News - In late December 2025, major streaming platforms including Spotify, SoundCloud, and YouTube have seen a rapid influx of Christmas songs generated by artificial intelligence (AI), masquerading as releases from seemingly independent artists such as Dean Snowfield, Sleighbelle, and Daniel & The Holly Jollies. These artists do not exist; their holiday covers are AI-manufactured replicas of existing seasonal standards. This growing phenomenon was highlighted on December 24 by NOS journalist Jacobien van der Kleij, citing music expert Kris Keijser and data scientist Janne Spijkervet. Keijser, who himself produces AI-assisted tracks, notes a perceptible artificial 'noise' in these songs, though advancing AI tools like Suno have improved quality. Meanwhile, Deezer's analytics reveal that about a third of all daily uploads—over 30,000 tracks—are AI-generated, a staggering volume reflecting a broader industry trend.
The penetration of AI into music intelligence is rooted in generative AI models trained on massive datasets of existing songs worldwide. This technology creates new compositions by learning and mimicking known artists' styles without requiring human performance or explicit consent. Notably, the AI cover of “Santa Baby” by Sleighbelle on Spotify has been streamed over 14 million times, frequently placed alongside works by legendary performers such as Ella Fitzgerald and Michael Bublé, misleading listeners. Deezer and Ipsos surveys indicate that 97% of listeners cannot differentiate AI-generated tracks from those by real artists, exacerbating concerns over undisclosed AI content on streaming services.
Critically, this increase in AI music challenges the economic and artistic welfare of musicians. Spijkervet states that AI-induced impersonation not only mocks artists by replicating their voices but also causes direct revenue loss. Spotify has removed an estimated 75 million 'spam tracks'—largely AI-generated clones—this past year, acknowledging the scope of the problem. However, platforms do not consistently flag AI music, impeding listener awareness and undermining artists’ intellectual property rights.
The issue is especially acute in the Christmas music genre, where tradition, emotional resonance, and authenticity are paramount. Industry specialist Keijser emphasizes that genuine holiday songs must connect deeply with listeners through story and feeling—elements AI has yet to convincingly reproduce. AI renditions tend to be generic and lack the human imperfections and 'groove' that characterize timeless classics by The Band or D’Angelo. Spijkervet echoes this, underscoring the genre’s reliance on nostalgia and warmth, which AI-generated music experiments struggle to evoke.
Underlying causes include the rapid improvement of generative AI technologies and scarcity of enforceable policies governing their use. Several legal actions are underway involving labels suing AI music platforms like Suno and Udio for unauthorized exploitation of copyrighted works in training datasets. These disputes signal an impending regulatory impasse that could throttle AI’s unregulated growth in music production.
The impact on the music ecosystem is multifaceted. On one hand, AI provides creative tools for artists looking to experiment or augment their songwriting process. On the other, rampant unregulated AI content risks commoditizing music, devaluing human artistry, and saturating streaming catalogs with formulaic compositions. Economically, musicians face lost royalties and visibility, potentially stunting career sustainability.
Looking ahead, if current trends persist, streaming services may become dominated by AI-curated playlists where differentiation between human and synthetic performers blurs, further disadvantaging original artists. To counter this, industry stakeholders, policymakers, and platforms must collaborate to implement clear AI content labeling, strengthen copyright enforcement, and educate consumers. Moreover, legislative frameworks tailored to AI’s unique challenges in intellectual property and attribution are urgently needed.
In conclusion, while AI-generated Christmas songs exemplify advances in technology-driven music production, they simultaneously pose a serious threat to authentic artistic expression and economic viability within the creative industries. The path forward requires balancing innovation with respect for creators’ rights and preserving the cultural significance embedded in genres like holiday music.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
