NextFin News - Turkey's Savings Deposit Insurance Fund completed an off-exchange sale of frozen investment funds' blue-chip stock holdings on Nov. 3, placing the shares directly with investment and pension funds rather than dumping them onto Borsa Istanbul, according to a notice of the transaction. The sale is the first major disposal of the liquid assets inside the 131 funds frozen in September, and it is the clearest test yet of whether the authorities can unwind a roughly $20 billion fund collapse without reigniting the market rout that forced the freeze in the first place.
The Sale and Why the Off-Market Route Matters
The transaction, executed through an off-exchange placement, moves the funds' most marketable assets — shares in Borsa Istanbul's large-cap, liquid names — into the hands of institutional buyers at negotiated prices. By going off-market, the liquidators sidestep the central problem that triggered the September crisis: the frozen funds' remaining holdings are concentrated in thinly traded, low-free-float stocks that cannot be sold on the exchange without cratering their prices.
The legal basis for that approach was laid in the fund liquidation law parliament approved on Oct. 22. The legislation, which allows interim payments of up to 1 million lira to eligible investors, also authorises the regulator to approve "alternative asset sales, including off-exchange transactions, to protect investors' recovery values." In other words, the state has decided that selling quietly to a handful of institutions is less destructive than selling loudly on the exchange — a recognition that in this liquidation, the normal market is the enemy of value.
The Capital Markets Board, or SPK, froze the funds on Sept. 17 after several portfolio managers failed to meet redemption requests, ordering the liquidation of 131 funds spanning seven asset managers: Tera Portföy, Pusula Portföy, Hedef, Atlas, A1 Capital, Pardus and Bulls. Private lender İş Bankası was appointed liquidator for the Tera funds and state-owned Ziraat Bankası for the other six groups. The liquidation window was later extended from three to six months, a decision the board said took "into account the portfolio structures of the funds subject to liquidation and market developments."
The funds held more than 890 billion lira ($18.3 billion) of assets and affected 455,758 unique investors, the regulator said, citing central securities depository records. Other estimates put the total closer to $20 billion. The unwind is already partly complete: by Oct. 22 the number of funds still undergoing liquidation had fallen from 131 to 47, with Hedef Portföy finishing 18 of its 31 funds and paying 8.9 billion lira to 10,008 accounts; cash payments and asset transfers across the programme had reached 49.7 billion lira spanning 55,755 accounts.
How the Bubble Was Built
The crisis did not start with a market crash. It started with a feedback loop that made a crash inevitable.
Certain domestic funds bought up large quantities of shares in companies with a small free float. These concentrated purchases inflated both the share prices and the apparent value of the funds holding them. High reported returns drew in more investors, supplying fund managers with fresh money to buy the same or related shares. Two Pusula Portföy funds posted gains of 164% and 144% in the first seven months of 2026.
The scheme had a second gear. In early September, Tera's TP2 money-market fund disclosed a related-party reverse-repo agreement at a 43% interest rate — a transaction that would have been unthinkable in a normal market. Prosecutors are now investigating whether fund valuations were artificially inflated through coordinated trading in a handful of small-cap names, including Katilimevim, Gundogdu Gida and Destek Finans.
The mechanism is a modern version of a Ponzi structure: inflows bid up affiliated stocks, mark-to-market accounting books the gains, the higher net asset value attracts more inflows, and the cycle repeats until redemptions exceed new money. At that point the music stops — because the assets that back the reported returns cannot be sold at anything like their marked value. Turkey's justice minister has described the episode as a "Ponzi-like scheme."
Why the Blue-Chip Fire Sale Almost Happened
When the redemption run began in mid-September, fund managers faced a brutal asymmetry. Their core holdings — the manipulated small-caps — were completely illiquid and unsaleable. To raise cash, they were forced to dump whatever liquid assets they held, namely Borsa Istanbul's blue-chip BIST 30 names. That triggered a market-wide selloff: the BIST 100 plunged around 16% in September, its steepest monthly decline since 2008.
This is the crucial point that the Nov. 3 off-exchange sale addresses. In a normal fund liquidation, the manager sells assets on the open market and distributes the proceeds. Here, selling on the open market was the original sin — it is exactly what would have destroyed the remaining value. The off-exchange placement to pension and investment funds is an attempt to break that loop: find a buyer that can hold the stocks without marking them to a distressed price, and spare the broader index another leg down.
The government moved quickly to contain the fallout. On the day after the freeze, the Financial Stability Committee, chaired by Treasury and Finance Minister Mehmet Şimşek, declared that the problem was concentrated in one segment of the fund market and was "temporary and manageable." Turkey's sovereign wealth fund bought blue-chip stocks on Sept. 17 to prop up the equity market, according to people with knowledge of the matter, and the central bank provided lira liquidity support. Parliament's Oct. 22 law lets the TMSF sell assets before court proceedings conclude — a deliberate acceleration, so the state is not paralysed while criminal cases run for years.
The Second-Order Problem: MSCI and the Free-Float Lie
The first-order effect of the scandal is the loss of investor money. The second-order effect is more dangerous: it has exposed a hole in how Turkey's market is measured.
MSCI froze certain index-related changes for Turkish equities on Oct. 15, citing "serious concerns raised by institutional investors about possible coordinated trading through fund holdings closely affiliated with certain smaller listed companies, which undermines the reliability of free float estimates and market integrity." The index provider warned that if sufficient progress is not evident by June 2027, it may consider a consultation on moving Turkey from Emerging Market to Frontier or Standalone status.
This is not a cosmetic issue. Free-float weighting is the foundation of how global index funds allocate capital. If a large chunk of a stock's supposedly tradeable float is actually locked inside affiliated funds whose prices were manufactured, then the index weights are wrong, and the funds tracking them are holding risk they did not price for. A downgrade to Frontier status would force passive emerging-market mandates to sell Turkish equities — a mechanical, price-insensitive wave of selling that would hit the very blue chips the authorities are trying to stabilise.
The corner-stock collapses tell the story. Destek Finans, one of the three names at the centre of the criminal complaints, has been ejected from both the BIST 30 and the BIST 100, and Katilimevim was removed from the BIST 100 in the exchange's quarterly reshuffle. Market analysis puts Katilimevim's shares down more than 80% in lira terms from their mid-year peak. When the stocks that propped up the funds' returns lose that much, the reported net asset values that half a million investors relied on were never real.
The Counter-Thesis: Contained, Not Systemic
The strongest argument against a doom scenario is straightforward: the authorities have ring-fenced the damage, and the real economy is not the fund industry. The affected funds represent a segment of the asset-management market, not the banking system. Interim payments of up to 1 million lira began on Oct. 30 through İş Bankası and Ziraat Bankası, giving the smallest savers cash flow while the liquidation runs. Finance Minister Şimşek, whose credibility programme of orthodox policy has anchored the lira and brought inflation down from its 2023 peak, has repeatedly framed the episode as confined to a specific market-abuse problem, and the central bank's liquidity operations prevented a credit event.
There is weight to this view. The crisis was caught before it infected bank balance sheets, and the state's deposit insurer is now in control of the asset sales rather than a panicked crowd of fund managers. The off-exchange placement is evidence that the liquidation is being managed deliberately, not chaotically. And the clawback effort is already producing cash: more than 18 billion lira ($360 million) has been returned by 37 people as part of the widening investigation into alleged illicit gains.
But the counter-thesis rests on two assumptions that the coming months will test. First, that the TMSF can recover enough from asset sales and from investors who exited early with "excessive" profits — authorities have opened accounts at state-run Birlesik Fon Bankası for voluntary repayments and have frozen the assets of 214 individuals and companies identified as having profited. Second, that MSCI does not pull the Frontier trigger. If the index provider does, the forced selling would be systemic in the only way that matters for a market like Turkey's: it would be indiscriminate, and it would not care about the government's containment story.
What to Watch
The liquidation will run into 2027 and will produce intermittent selling pressure in the shares the funds still hold. Three signals will determine whether this is a contained scandal or a structural repricing of Turkish risk:
- The recovery rate. As the TMSF sells assets and publishes results, the gap between the funds' last reported net asset values and the cash actually recovered will reveal the true size of the hole. The chief executive of OMG Capital Advisors, an emerging-markets advisory firm, estimated the assets would fetch "pennies on the dollar." If recovery rates approach that, the interim payments will be the high-water mark for investor recoveries.
- MSCI's June 2027 decision. A consultation on Frontier reclassification would be the clearest signal that the market-integrity damage is structural, not cyclical.
- Foreign ownership of Turkish equities. If global investors keep reducing exposure through the liquidation period, the cost of equity for Turkish companies rises, and Şimşek's stabilisation programme loses its market anchor.
There is also a political dimension. Turkish media reported that Melis Sütşurup Sandal, the wife of singer Mustafa Sandal, earned 2.355 billion lira from Tera's TLY fund — the top individual on the prosecutors' list — with total 2026 withdrawals near 15.8 billion lira. How visibly the state recovers such gains will shape public tolerance for a slow, multi-year liquidation.
Conclusion: A Cyclical Crash on Top of a Structural Flaw
The right way to read this episode is as two separate problems stacked on top of each other. The market crash itself is cyclical: prices fell because forced sellers met no buyers, and once the forced selling ends, the panic premium can fade. The BIST 100 can recover from a 16% monthly decline the way it has recovered from others.
The free-float integrity problem is structural. It will not revert on its own. It requires new rules — and the SPK's August changes limiting funds' holdings in low-free-float shares and affiliated issuers are a start — plus consistent enforcement that global index providers can observe. Until Turkey demonstrates that a stock's listed float is actually tradeable, the market will carry a permanent discount, and the threat of Frontier reclassification will hang over every rally.
In the short term, watch the recovery rate from asset sales and whether interim payments hold. In the medium term, watch foreign ownership flows and the lira. In the long term, watch whether the regulatory response survives the political pressure that a slow liquidation will generate. The off-exchange sale on Nov. 3 was the first real test of the state's ability to manage the unwind — and the fact that it had to happen off-market, rather than on the exchange, is itself the clearest measure of how much of the funds' reported value was never real.
The liquidation and loss of value experienced even in instruments considered the safest, such as money-market funds, will push savers into the informal economy, foreign currency, or putting their money under the mattress.
— Sönmez, analyst, quoted in coverage of the crisis.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
