NextFin News - In a significant departure from traditional diplomatic protocols, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has initiated a series of clandestine discussions with Raúl Guillermo Rodríguez Castro, the grandson and close confidant of Cuba’s 94-year-old former leader, Raúl Castro. According to reports from Axios on February 18, 2026, these high-stakes interactions are occurring outside of official state channels, effectively sidelining the administration of Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel. The move signals a calculated assessment by the White House that real power on the island remains concentrated within the Castro family and the military-industrial conglomerate GAESA, rather than the formal Communist Party apparatus.
The timing of this diplomatic maneuver is critical. Cuba is currently grappling with its most severe systemic crisis since the 1959 Revolution, characterized by a collapsing national power grid, acute food and fuel shortages, and a near-total cessation of tourism. The pressure on Havana intensified significantly following the January 3, 2026, U.S. military operation in Venezuela that led to the capture of Nicolás Maduro. That operation not only eliminated Cuba’s primary source of subsidized oil but also resulted in the deaths of at least 32 Cuban intelligence and military personnel stationed in Caracas, sending a clear message regarding the reach of U.S. kinetic capabilities under U.S. President Trump.
U.S. President Trump has publicly characterized Cuba as a "failed nation," noting recently aboard Air Force One that the island lacks even the fuel necessary for aircraft to depart. However, the administration’s strategy appears more nuanced than simple regime decapitation. By engaging with the 41-year-old Rodríguez Castro—often referred to by his nickname "El Cangrejo"—Rubio is targeting a younger, more pragmatic generation of the Cuban elite. This cohort is perceived by Washington as being more business-oriented and increasingly disillusioned with the failures of revolutionary communism. The goal is to identify internal actors capable of facilitating a transition that satisfies U.S. demands for democratization while maintaining enough stability to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe or a mass migration crisis.
The analytical framework behind this approach draws heavily from the recent "Venezuela Model." Following the removal of Maduro, the U.S. allowed certain regime insiders, such as Delcy Rodríguez, to remain in transitional roles. Sources familiar with the Rubio-Castro discussions suggest that Washington is "looking for the next Delcy in Cuba." This indicates a willingness to offer exit ramps or roles in a future government to members of the current establishment who are willing to break with the old guard. For Rubio, a Cuban-American whose political identity is deeply rooted in opposition to the Castro regime, this pragmatic engagement represents a sophisticated evolution of policy: using the threat of total collapse to force a negotiated surrender of the one-party system.
However, this strategy carries substantial political risks. Any deal that allows members of the Castro family to remain on the island or escape prosecution would likely face fierce backlash from the hardline Cuban exile community in Miami. Just last week, Republican lawmakers urged U.S. President Trump to prosecute Raúl Castro for the 1996 downing of the "Brothers to the Rescue" aircraft. Rubio must therefore balance the strategic necessity of a peaceful transition with the domestic political requirement for accountability. As the energy blockade continues to squeeze the island's economy, the window for a "managed" transition may be closing, forcing the Cuban elite to choose between a negotiated exit or a chaotic collapse.
Looking forward, the success of these secret talks will depend on whether Rodríguez Castro can deliver the support of the Cuban military (FAR) and the intelligence services. If Rubio can successfully drive a wedge between the aging revolutionary leadership and the younger technocratic and military wings, the U.S. may achieve its long-standing goal of regime change without the costs of a direct military intervention. For now, the "discussions about the future" continue in the shadows, even as the public rhetoric from the White House remains focused on maximum pressure.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
