NextFin News - The crackle of a recorded voice note from Oromiyeh Central Prison has become the haunting soundtrack to a sharp escalation in Iran’s use of capital punishment. Mehrab Abdollahzadeh, a 29-year-old Kurdish shop owner, used his final moments to maintain his innocence before his execution earlier this month, an event that human rights organizations describe as part of a broader, systematic surge in state-sanctioned killings. Since the outbreak of direct hostilities involving the United States and Israel on February 28, the United Nations has verified the execution of at least 32 political prisoners, a figure that signals a pivot toward internal repression as a tool of wartime governance.
The acceleration is stark when measured against previous periods of domestic unrest. According to Amnesty International, 45 executions on politically motivated charges were recorded throughout the entirety of 2025. The current pace suggests that the Iranian judiciary is compressing legal timelines to deliver a message of absolute control. Kaveh Kermanshahi of the Kurdistan Human Rights Network, an organization that has long monitored the disproportionate targeting of ethnic minorities in Iran’s judicial system, argues that the regime is attempting to project an image of stability. By intensifying repression, the state seeks to signal to both domestic dissidents and foreign adversaries that its internal grip remains unshaken despite the pressures of war and the remnants of the January uprising.
The legal threshold for these executions has drawn intense international scrutiny. Sasan Azadvar, a 21-year-old karate champion, was executed last month following a conviction for "moharabeh," or waging war against God. While state media broadcast a confession involving the damaging of police property, Azadvar was not accused of a lethal offense. Under international legal standards, the death penalty is reserved for the "most serious crimes," typically involving intentional killing. The use of capital punishment for property damage or "collaboration with the enemy" reflects a judiciary that has increasingly abandoned procedural transparency in favor of rapid, deterrent sentencing.
Economic indicators reflect the heightened geopolitical risk premium now embedded in the region. Brent crude oil is currently trading at 110.63 USD per barrel, a level that underscores market anxiety regarding supply stability in the Persian Gulf. While the Iranian government has not officially commented on the surge in executions, Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei, the head of Iran’s judiciary, recently dismissed international criticism. He stated that the courts would not be swayed by external pressure, reinforcing the view that the judicial system is operating as a primary pillar of the national security apparatus during the conflict.
The human cost is often hidden behind the "espionage" labels applied by the state. Erfan Shakourzadeh, an aerospace engineering student executed on May 11, left a note claiming his confession was extracted through eight months of solitary confinement and torture. The Norway-based Hengaw human rights organization has highlighted a "complete lack of transparency" in these proceedings, noting that the speed of trials has made effective legal defense nearly impossible. For the families of the condemned, the process often ends in silence; Abdollahzadeh’s body was reportedly not returned to his relatives, a practice frequently used to prevent funerals from becoming focal points for further protest.
The current trajectory suggests that the Iranian leadership views domestic dissent not as a civil matter, but as a secondary front in its broader military engagement. By labeling critics as "Israeli spies" or "enemies of God," the state effectively removes them from the protection of civil law. This strategy of internal consolidation through fear is a high-stakes gamble. While it may suppress immediate unrest, the reliance on the gallows to maintain order creates a brittle form of stability that depends entirely on the continued efficacy of the security services. As the war continues, the boundary between judicial process and military necessity in Tehran appears to have all but vanished.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
