U.S.-China Relations
NextFin News - U.S. stocks climbed on Monday, November 9, shrugging off a fresh scandal at Nvidia as the S&P 500 gained 1.6% to 7,498.99 and the Nasdaq Composite jumped 2.2% to 25,120.56, even as the chip giant's board launched an independent investigation into whether CEO Jensen Huang was targeted by a foreign intelligence effort. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 1.5% to 52,042.51, and the VIX volatility index fell 14.2% to 21.51, signaling that fear from last week's election-driven selloff is receding. Nvidia itself opened 4% lower before recovering to close at $178.77, up 3.3% on the day but still down roughly 25% from its October 6 peak of $239.24. The rally's central tension: investors are treating a national-security-tinged governance crisis at the world's most important company as noise, not as a reason to abandon the AI trade.
Markets Look Past the Nvidia Probe
The market's reaction is the story. Nvidia's board said on Sunday that an independent committee, assisted by outside counsel, would investigate reports that Huang had been the target of a foreign espionage effort after a romantic relationship with Alice Huang, a former executive at data-center partner Megaspeed International whom U.S. officials believe was sharing information with the Chinese government. Huang is not related to the Nvidia CEO.
In a draft email to employees, Huang apologized:
"I owe my family and all of you an apology," Huang wrote in a draft email to employees. "I was unfaithful to my wife. My actions hurt her and our children. There is no excuse for what I did." He added that he took "full responsibility" and remained "fully committed to NVIDIA."
The board said it has no reason to believe national security or company secrets were compromised and expressed confidence in Huang's leadership. Nvidia's John Rizzo, head of public policy communications, said: "Today's news will not slow NVIDIA. Jensen is committed to continuing to lead NVIDIA as CEO without interruption."
That distinction - personal misconduct versus compromised secrets - is exactly where the market drew its line. Nvidia opened at $173.04, dipped to a low of $171.36, and closed at $178.77 on volume of 141.96 million shares. A 4% premarket drop became a 3.3% gain by the close. The Nasdaq Composite, where Nvidia is one of the largest constituents, outperformed the S&P 500 by a wide margin.
The resilience matters because Nvidia has already absorbed a brutal week. On November 5, the day after Democrats swept the midterm elections, Nvidia fell 7.4% as the Nasdaq Composite plunged 4.9% and the S&P 500 dropped 4.2% on speculation that a Democratic Congress would clamp down on AI investment. The VIX spiked 64% that day to 28.18. Monday's rebound - with the VIX back down to 21.51 - suggests investors are separating two different risks: a political threat to AI spending (structural, still unresolved) and a CEO scandal (idiosyncratic, contained if the probe finds no secrets leaked).
The probe itself widens an already uncomfortable chapter. In October, Huang acknowledged on the record that he had a relationship with Alice Huang tied to Megaspeed, calling their interactions "completely normal and not unusual." The company also said on October 29 that allegations of export-control evasion were "thoroughly investigated and debunked last year." The board's independent investigation means those statements, and the underlying relationship, are now subject to fresh scrutiny. For shareholders, the risk is not the affair; it is the possibility that the CEO's personal judgment, or the company's disclosure controls, were weaker than investors assumed.
There is precedent for markets underestimating this kind of risk. When a dominant technology company's governance is questioned, the first instinct is to treat it as a reputational issue that will pass. The second-order effect is slower and harder to see: customers pause procurement decisions, partners reassess information-sharing protocols, and regulators gain a reason to look more closely at business practices they might otherwise have left alone. Nvidia's board is betting the probe will clear the CEO. The market, for now, is betting with them.
The Real Driver: Jobs Data and Divided Government
The rally had a cleaner fundamental driver than the Nvidia drama: a blowout employment report. The Labor Department said on Friday that the U.S. added 165,000 jobs in October, nearly triple the 59,000 economists polled had expected. The unemployment rate fell to 4.1% from 4.2%, and September's gain was revised up to 60,000 from an initially reported 29,000. Average hourly earnings rose 0.4% month over month, ahead of the 0.3% forecast. Year over year, wages increased 3.1%, keeping pressure on the Fed's inflation calculus.
The message to the Federal Reserve is awkward. A labor market adding 165,000 jobs with wages rising faster than expected gives the central bank little reason to rush into rate cuts, even as the bond market has been pricing in easing. The 10-year Treasury yield, which fell to a two-month low of 4.822% on November 5 according to Tradeweb before the jobs data pushed back on rate-cut bets, remains elevated by any standard of the past decade - a reminder that the "higher for longer" trade is far from dead.
This is the fork in the road that defines the current cycle. Strong jobs and sticky wages argue for a Fed that stays restrictive. But a restrictive Fed is precisely what the stock market's post-election rebound assumes it will not face. If the labor market keeps printing numbers like October's, the December rate decision becomes genuinely contested, and the bond market's current pricing - which has been leaning toward cuts - will have to adjust. That adjustment is what keeps the equity rally honest.
Equally important is the political backdrop. Democrats won control of both chambers of Congress in a historic midterm outcome, setting up divided government. Investors initially punished the AI trade on fears of tighter scrutiny of data centers and chip exports. But by Monday, the dominant read had flipped: divided government means gridlock, and gridlock means no sweeping new constraints on the technology sector. The market is pricing in policy paralysis as a form of deregulation.
Moderna Earnings Add Fuel
Earnings provided a third tailwind. Moderna reported third-quarter revenue of $1.31 billion, up 29.2% year over year, with GAAP diluted earnings per share of $0.38 against a consensus estimate of a $1.10 loss. Net income was $162 million, a swing from a $200 million loss in the year-ago quarter, driven by higher international COVID-19 vaccine sales. The company raised its full-year revenue growth guidance to 15%-25% from "up to 10%" and lifted its year-end cash and investments outlook to $8.1 billion-$8.3 billion. Moderna shares rose 6.3% to $270.23, a fresh 52-week high.
The beat matters beyond one biotech name. It is evidence that companies outside the AI complex can still deliver surprises, giving portfolio managers a reason to rotate rather than simply de-risk. Year to date, Moderna shares have risen more than 700%, compared with 8% growth for the broader healthcare industry - a reminder that idiosyncratic catalysts can still outrun sector tides. In a week dominated by political and governance headlines, a clean earnings beat is a useful reminder that corporate fundamentals have not been suspended.
The Hegseth Impeachment Vote: Political Noise, Market Irrelevance
Meanwhile, Washington is preparing for a constitutional confrontation that markets are largely ignoring. Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky said he will force a House vote this week on articles of impeachment against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, using a "privileged" resolution that leadership cannot easily block. The charges center on Hegseth's conduct of the Iran war, alleged violations of the War Powers Resolution, a strike that the articles say killed or wounded more than 200 people at a school in Minab, Iran, and boat strikes on suspected drug smugglers the resolution calls extrajudicial killings of at least 221 people.
The math is tight. With 433 members seated - 218 Republicans, 214 Democrats, one independent, and two vacancies - impeachment needs 217 votes if everyone votes. Democrats hold 214, so they need three Republicans to cross over, with Massie himself as one. Massie puts the odds of passage at "better than a 50 percent chance." For scale, Republicans impeached Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas in 2024 by 214-213, and only two cabinet secretaries have ever been impeached in U.S. history.
Even if the House votes to impeach, removal is a different matter. Conviction in the Senate requires two-thirds of senators present - 67 of 100. Against the outgoing Senate's partisan split, conviction would need roughly 20 Republicans. The first confrontation over Hegseth tests how the midterm wipeout has weakened President Trump's authority among his own party, not whether markets will react. Defense stocks have shown no meaningful move on the news, which is itself the point: in a market fixated on AI, rates, and earnings, a cabinet impeachment is background noise unless it threatens defense budgets or contracts.
Why the Market Is Right to Look Through the Noise - For Now
The cyclical-versus-structural call here is straightforward, and getting it right determines everything. The Nvidia espionage probe is a cyclical, idiosyncratic shock: it mean-reverts if the independent investigation finds no compromise of secrets or export-control violations. The board's own statement - no reason to believe national security was breached - is the market's working assumption. History supports this read: corporate governance scandals at dominant technology companies have repeatedly proved to be buying opportunities when the underlying franchise remains intact. What matters is not whether a CEO made a personal mistake, but whether that mistake opens a door to something that can actually impair cash flows.
The structural question is different, and it is not resolved. The post-election selloff in chipmakers reflected a genuine regime concern: that a Democratic Congress will slow the AI capital-expenditure boom through export controls, data-center permitting, or antitrust action. That threat has not gone away. What changed on Monday is that investors decided the scandal was not the mechanism by which that threat arrives. A CEO's personal conduct, absent leaked secrets, does not reduce hyperscaler demand for GPUs.
The second-order implication is the one the crowd is not discussing. If Nvidia's stock treats a foreign-espionage allegation as a dip to buy, the market is effectively telling regulators and Congress that the AI trade is too entrenched to be disciplined by governance shocks. That emboldens the very capital-expenditure cycle that bond-market vigilantes are watching. The 10-year yield's failure to break decisively lower is the counter-signal: the economy is running hot enough that the Fed may not cut, and AI spending is a core reason why. There is a feedback loop here that few are tracing: higher-for-longer yields raise the discount rate on long-duration AI earnings, which should compress valuations - yet the same yields reflect an economy strong enough to keep spending on AI infrastructure. The market is holding both views at once, which is sustainable only until one of them breaks.
The adversarial case is real and must be stated plainly. If the investigation finds that Huang's relationship did lead to compromised technology, export-control evasion, or national-security breaches, the entire "idiosyncratic shock" thesis collapses. Nvidia would face not a governance cleanup but a structural revenue risk: loss of hyperscaler trust, tighter China restrictions, and potential leadership turnover. The falsifying signal is specific and observable: any board or government finding that company secrets or export-controlled technology were shared with a foreign intelligence service. That single development would convert a 4% premarket wobble into a multi-quarter earnings revision. A softer falsifying signal would be the resignation of Huang or the departure of major customers citing the probe.
There is also a valuation argument against the rally. Nvidia is trading at roughly 25 times forward earnings after a year in which its share price fell while earnings soared - cheap by its own history, but not cheap enough to ignore a genuine governance overhang. The stock's 50-day moving average sits near $220, well above the current price, which means any sustained weakness would run into technical selling from trend-followers who have been forced to de-risk. The rebound is real, but it is not yet a trend reversal.
What to Watch
Short term, watch the Nvidia investigation's scope and timeline, plus the House impeachment vote count - a passage would be a political first for this Congress but carries limited market impact. Medium term, the November 17 Nvidia fiscal third-quarter report is the real catalyst: analysts expect revenue of about $109 billion against the company's $108 billion plus-or-minus-2% guide, with gross margin near 74%. Long term, the structural question remains whether AI infrastructure spending can justify itself through realized profits, or whether the bond market's elevated yields eventually force a reckoning.
Scenarios: the base case is a contained Nvidia probe, continued gridlock in Washington, and a grinding recovery in the Nasdaq as earnings season proceeds. The upside case is a clean bill of health for Huang, which could trigger a violent short squeeze in the most hated trade of the month. The downside case is a damaging investigation finding, which would retest the November 5 lows and drag the broader index with it.
The market's message on Monday was clear: scandals are priced, but structural shifts are not. Investors are betting that a CEO's affair is a headline, while the real war over AI spending is still being fought in Congress, in bond yields, and in earnings reports - and none of those battles ended last week.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
