NextFin News - In a definitive move that marks a significant departure from the European Union’s regulatory playbook, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has finalized its intervention strategy for Apple and Google under the new Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act (DMCCA). On February 10, 2026, the watchdog confirmed it would not mirror the broad, self-executing mandates of the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), opting instead for a framework of targeted "Conduct Requirements" (CRs) tailored to specific digital activities. This decision follows the formal designation of both firms as having "Strategic Market Status" (SMS) in October 2025, a status that grants the CMA unprecedented powers to oversee their mobile ecosystems and search services through 2030.
The CMA’s approach, articulated in its latest regulatory roadmap, focuses on three primary pillars: choice screens, data portability, and fair ranking principles. Unlike the EU, which imposed a uniform set of "dos and don’ts" across all designated gatekeepers, the UK regulator has chosen to negotiate specific remedies for each firm. For Google, this involves mandates on search engine choice screens within the Android and Chrome environments and enhanced data portability for search history. For Apple, the focus remains on the "interconnectivity" of its iOS operating system and the transparency of its App Store commission structures. According to the Financial Times, the CMA’s decision to stop short of EU-style rules is a calculated attempt to balance competition with the stability of the UK’s tech sector, which Apple previously warned could be jeopardized by "punitive regulation."
The rationale behind this divergence is rooted in the DMCCA’s design, which emphasizes "proportionate and targeted" interventions. While the EU’s DMA operates on a per se basis—where certain behaviors are prohibited regardless of their specific market impact—the UK regime requires the CMA to prove that each intervention contributes to consumer benefits and is strictly necessary. This "surgical" approach is intended to avoid the unintended consequences of over-regulation, such as the degradation of user security or the stifling of native innovation. By focusing on "digital activities" rather than the entire corporate entity, the CMA has excluded peripheral services like Google’s Gemini AI and Apple’s hardware from the immediate scope of the SMS designation, providing a narrower, more manageable regulatory perimeter.
Data from the CMA’s initial investigations support the need for intervention but also highlight the complexity of the UK market. The watchdog found that Google has maintained a UK search market share of over 90% for 15 years, while Apple’s iOS ecosystem remains a closed loop for approximately 80% of its users, who rarely consider switching to Android. However, the CMA also acknowledged that the UK’s "developer economy" is uniquely integrated into these platforms. A blanket opening of these systems, as seen in the EU, could disrupt the revenue models of thousands of British app developers who rely on the security and billing infrastructure provided by the incumbents. Consequently, the CMA’s fair ranking principles are designed to protect these developers from arbitrary algorithm changes without forcing a total dismantling of the platform’s core architecture.
Looking ahead, this divergence creates a fragmented regulatory landscape for Big Tech in Europe. Apple and Google now face a "two-track" compliance burden: meeting the rigid requirements of Brussels while navigating the more nuanced, consultative process in London. This may lead to "regulatory arbitrage," where tech giants prioritize feature rollouts in the UK over the EU to avoid the latter’s stricter compliance hurdles. However, the CMA has left the door open for future escalation. The 2026 roadmap includes a "Category 2" list of interventions—such as fair and reasonable use of publisher content—that could be activated if the initial conduct requirements fail to dilute the firms' entrenched market power. As U.S. President Trump continues to advocate for the protection of American tech interests abroad, the UK’s more flexible stance may also serve as a diplomatic bridge, positioning London as a more pragmatic regulator than its counterparts in the European Commission.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
