NextFin News - In a significant escalation of diplomatic efforts to resolve the conflict in Eastern Europe, the White House confirmed on February 3, 2026, that high-level U.S. officials will join representatives from Ukraine and Russia for a new round of trilateral talks in Abu Dhabi. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced that U.S. President Trump’s Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, are scheduled to participate in the negotiations on February 4 and 5. The meeting, hosted in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), follows an initial round of discussions held in late January and comes at a critical juncture as the region faces renewed military intensity.
According to RBC-Ukraine, the upcoming session was originally slated for earlier in the week but was rescheduled to allow for the arrival of the American delegation. The Ukrainian delegation, which has already departed for the UAE, will face a Russian team led by Igor Kostyukov, the head of Russia’s Main Intelligence Directorate. The talks aim to build upon a framework established during the January 23–24 summit, where negotiators reportedly found common ground on technical military issues, such as prisoner exchanges and localized ceasefires, though they remained deadlocked on the fundamental question of territorial sovereignty.
The decision by U.S. President Trump to deploy Kushner alongside Witkoff underscores a preference for a "deal-making" approach to foreign policy, reminiscent of the Abraham Accords. Leavitt characterized the trilateral format as "historic," noting that it marks the first time all three nations have sat at a single table to negotiate a path toward peace. However, the diplomatic push is unfolding against a backdrop of severe kinetic escalation. On the eve of the talks, Russia launched a massive wave of strikes against Ukrainian energy infrastructure, particularly in Kharkiv, which Leavitt attributed to the "failed policies" of the previous administration while emphasizing U.S. President Trump’s urgency to end the war.
From an analytical perspective, the inclusion of Kushner—a figure without a formal cabinet post but with deep ties to the President—suggests that the administration is bypassing traditional State Department channels in favor of a more centralized, personal diplomacy. This "back-channel" methodology is designed to create a high-trust environment between the principals, yet it carries significant political risk. By placing such high-profile figures in the room, the administration is effectively tethering its domestic political capital to the outcome of the Abu Dhabi process. If the talks fail to produce a tangible de-escalation, the administration may find its leverage diminished both at home and among European allies who remain skeptical of a negotiated settlement that might favor Moscow.
Data from recent frontline reports indicates that Russia is attempting to maximize its territorial holdings before any potential freeze in the conflict. According to DeepState, Russian forces have recently advanced near two settlements in the Donetsk region, suggesting a strategy of "negotiating from strength." This military pressure serves as a double-edged sword for the Abu Dhabi talks: it creates a sense of urgency for a ceasefire but also makes the territorial concessions demanded by the Kremlin even more unpalatable for Kyiv. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has maintained that a final resolution on territorial integrity cannot be reached without a direct meeting with Vladimir Putin, a prospect the Kremlin has so far conditioned on a meeting taking place in Moscow.
The economic implications of these talks are equally profound. The "energy truce" discussed in previous rounds was intended to stabilize global energy markets and provide humanitarian relief to Ukrainian civilians during the winter months. However, the recent bombardment of Kharkiv’s power facilities suggests that Russia is using the threat of energy collapse as a primary bargaining chip. For the U.S. delegation, the challenge lies in decoupling humanitarian and energy stability from the broader political demands of the Kremlin. The administration’s focus on a "peace through strength" framework will be tested by whether Witkoff and Kushner can offer enough economic or security incentives to induce a genuine Russian withdrawal without compromising Ukrainian sovereignty.
Looking forward, the Abu Dhabi summit is likely to be the first in a series of iterative meetings rather than a venue for a final peace treaty. The most probable outcome for the February 4–5 session is the establishment of a formal "Contact Group" and a commitment to a temporary, monitored ceasefire. However, the long-term success of this trilateral initiative depends on the U.S. ability to provide security guarantees that satisfy Kyiv while offering a sanctions-relief roadmap that appeals to Moscow. As U.S. President Trump enters the second month of his term, the Abu Dhabi talks represent the first major test of his administration’s ability to translate transactional diplomacy into lasting geopolitical stability.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.